top of page

The Blank Page Season

Writer: Robert Sanders
Robert Sanders
Apr 6
5 min read

Updated: Apr 7

Matthieu Blazy at Chanel. Louise Trotter at Bottega Veneta. Jonathan Anderson at Dior. Fifteen designers were handed a blank page in the same season. These three had the most interesting answers.
Matthieu Blazy at Chanel. Louise Trotter at Bottega Veneta. Jonathan Anderson at Dior. Fifteen designers were handed a blank page in the same season. These three had the most interesting answers.

Fashion has always run on succession. One designer leaves, another arrives, the house continues. What happened in the autumn of 2025 was something different. In the space of a single season, fifteen creative directors debuted at major houses simultaneously. Jonathan Anderson at Dior. Matthieu Blazy at Chanel. Louise Trotter at Bottega Veneta. Haider Ackermann at Tom Ford. And eleven others behind them, each inheriting a different set of obligations, a different archive, a different set of commercial expectations dressed up as creative freedom.


The fashion press turned it into a competition. Who won? Who lost? Who was brave enough? Who played it too safe? That framing is understandable and almost entirely beside the point. What a season of fifteen blank pages tells you is not who the best designer is. It tells you what fashion thinks it is for right now, and where the people charged with its future think it should go.


Three debts stand out. Not because the others were less interesting, but because these three, taken together, sketch something like a picture.


Jonathan Anderson walked into Dior carrying more expectation than any designer in recent memory. He had built Loewe into one of the most culturally significant houses in fashion through a combination of wit, scholarship, and an almost anthropological interest in objects and their histories. What he did with that at Dior was neither repeat himself nor simply genuflect toward the archive. He commissioned the filmmaker Adam Curtis to make a short film about imagination under pressure, screened it upside-down on a pyramid above the audience, and then sent out seventy-four looks that traversed the entire history of the house without ever feeling like a museum. He quoted Galliano's Fall 2005. He nodded to Yves Saint Laurent's brief and brilliant tenure. He took the Bar jacket, Dior's most sacred object, and made it shorter, stranger, and more interesting than it had been in years. When asked what he was trying to say, he said something worth remembering:


"When you come into a house like Dior, you can't be precious anymore. For me, it's about, how do you curate your own taste level?"

That is not the answer of a designer trying to win a debut. It is the answer of someone who intends to stay.


Matthieu Blazy at Chanel was the season's other great occasion. He is only the fourth creative director in the house's 115-year history, which is the kind of statistic that should produce either paralysis or recklessness. It produced neither. He opened with a tweed pantsuit, not the tweed suit everyone was expecting, but a pantsuit, the kind Gabrielle Chanel herself wore in the 1920s when she was first making the argument that women's clothes should not restrict movement or announce submission. The gilt buttons were logo-less. Visible above the waistband were thick ribbed ivory underwear in jersey, the fabric Chanel originally borrowed from men's workwear. The three ages of the house, in a single pair of kecks, as AnOther Magazine put it. Blazy had described the challenge to himself as looking at the codes of Chanel not to clean them up but to see them from another perspective. The resulting collection moved between time and genre with a looseness that felt genuinely new to the house. Not a repudiation of what came before. A deepening of it.


Louise Trotter at Bottega Veneta was the quieter debut of the three, which is fitting for a house whose founding motto was that your own initials should be enough. She is the only woman among this round of major appointments, a fact that says something depressing about the industry and something encouraging about Bottega Veneta's judgment. Her debut began where the house began, with the Intrecciato leather weave, treated not as an archive motif to deploy but as a method and a metaphor. She said she wanted to return to the beginning to find the present. The clothes were chic, office-ready, deeply functional, and quietly extraordinary. Her peacoat had a strip of Intrecciato at the collar. Her Lauren bag was reworked with proportions that actually suited daily use. Her roomy trousers were the kind that working women want and rarely find at this level. The female gaze is a phrase that gets used loosely, but Trotter's debut was a case study in what it actually looks like when someone designs women's clothes from an instinctive understanding of how women live in them.


What do these three debuts, taken together, actually say?


They say that fashion's most interesting designers right now are not trying to destroy their inheritance. They are trying to read it more carefully than their predecessors did. Anderson going through the Dior archive not to reproduce it but to understand what it was actually reaching for. Blazy squishing Chanel's codes until they reveal the ideology behind them rather than just the surface. Trotter returning to Bottega's founding philosophy of craft over signaling at precisely the moment when the luxury market has spent a decade running in the opposite direction.


The archive is not a costume cupboard. It is a set of unresolved arguments. The best designers know the difference.
The archive is not a costume cupboard. It is a set of unresolved arguments. The best designers know the difference.

They also say something about the moment fashion finds itself in. Anderson put it plainly: the world is not operating in a linear line. Everything is bizarre. The collections that resonated this season were not the ones that offered an escape from that, but the ones that reflected it honestly while still producing something beautiful. The Adam Curtis film at Dior, titled "Do You Dare Enter the House?", was not a provocation. It was a genuine question about what imagination is for when everything outside feels ungovernable. Fashion's answer, from these three at least, was to make clothes that mean something. To treat the archive not as a costume cupboard but as a set of unresolved arguments worth continuing.


Blazy said something at Chanel that has stayed with me. He was asked why couture still matters. His answer was that buying something for an emotional purpose is reason enough. That is a quiet but serious claim. It is the claim that fashion makes for itself when it is at its most honest, and it is a claim that the best work of this season backed up.


The blank page turned out not to be so blank after all. Every new creative director inherited a room full of furniture. What distinguished the best debuts was not what they removed. It was what they chose to sit with, and why.

Comments


bottom of page